The WASFAA News
       June/July 2002 Online Publication       



In the world of financial aid, the language is full of acronyms.

NASFAA News...
Compliance Issues
by Sydney Jamison of NewSource

Student Status Reporting: New Name, Same Significance

In the world of financial aid, the language is full of acronyms. Most financial aid professionals recognize "SSCR" as the acronym for the Student Status Confirmation Report and the activities that are associated with reporting requirements. Recently, the SSCR has been replaced with "Enrollment Reporting." (NSLDS Newsletter, Number 2, January 2002, see www.nsldsfap.ed.gov). Does this mean we now have "ER" as our new acronym?

In another world, "ER" stands for emergency room. Would this be appropriate for our financial aid world? Well, that depends. You could find yourself in a state of emergency if your institution's records do not reflect the same information that is on the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS).

Remember, your responsibility is to report:
  • Enrollment status changes with appropriate dates to NSLDS.
  • A student's last day of attendance or withdrawal to lessthan half-time.
  • All student withdrawals in a timely manner. What happens during a compliance review?
  • The reviewer determines your institution's attendance recording requirements: Are you required to take attendance? Or are you a school that is not required to take attendance? 34 CFR 668.22(b) or (c)
  • Once determined, the appropriate academic, enroll- ment and/or attendance records are requested and reviewed.
  • Using the above records, the reviewer determines if the student is still actively enrolled, enrolled less than halftime, has withdrawn or never enrolled and identifies the date that the student's enrollment status changed.
  • The reviewer then compares the Loan Detail screens from NSLDS with the identified student's status and effective date of that status.
  • The institution is asked to explain discrepancies appearing on NSLDS with the status and dates that the reviewer obtained from the review of the institution's records.
  • Discrepancies identified as errors in reporting will need to be corrected/updated by the institution. Documentation will need to be provided to the reviewer to support that the corrections have been made and accepted by NSLDS.
  • In some situations, if the error rate is found to be greater than 10%, the institution will be required to perform a portfolio review.
As a dose of preventative medicine, here are some common ER errors found during reviews:
  • "Date of determination" (of a student's change in enrollment status) is reported instead of the required last date of attendance.
  • Untimely or failure to report a student's withdrawal date.
  • Reporting an incorrect enrollment status.
  • Using the wrong alpha character that represents a student's current or past enrollment status.
  • Not reporting when a student has dropped below halftime. Record-keeping responsibilities are very important. All participants must do their part to ensure that student enrollment information is up-to-date, accurate, documented, and officially relayed to the appropriate reporting agency in a timely manner. If properly done, the ER review should prove to be a simple confirmation of the institution's enrollment reporting process and not an "emergency related" headache!


 Back   Forward
table of contents